The Fourth Circuit recently sent a strong statement reinforcing the “rigorous analysis” required by Rule 23 in damages class actions. The message was blunt: class certification orders “are not participation trophies that are handed out to everyone on the tee ball team.” State of Rhode Island Office of the General Treasurer v. The Boeing Co., 182 F.4th 422, 447 (4th Cir. 2026) (“Boeing”). Instead, under long-standing Supreme Court precedent, plaintiffs seeking certification of a damages class must offer a reliable method of proving class-wide damages that fits their ...
About Class Actions Brief Blog
Class Actions Brief is your source for analysis of class action developments in federal and state judicial systems nationwide. Our attorneys use their experience representing clients both in and against class actions to provide fresh takes and commentary on what is happening in our courts today.
Editors
Topics
- Antitrust
- Appeals
- Arbitration
- Bankruptcy
- Choice of Law
- Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA)
- Class Counsel/Attorney's Fees
- Class Definition
- Class Representatives
- Collective Action
- Commonality/Predominance
- Consumer Protection
- Damages
- Data Privacy
- Discovery
- Due Process
- Employment
- Expert
- Jurisdictional Issues
- Manageability
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Recent Filings
- Securities
- Settlement
- Standing
- Standing/Mootness
- Statute of Limitations
- Tolling
Jurisdictions
- All Jurisdictions
- D.C. Circuit
- District of South Carolina
- Eastern District of North Carolina
- Fifth Circuit
- Fourth Circuit
- Legislation
- Middle District of North Carolina
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina Business Court
- North Carolina State Courts
- North Carolina Supreme Court
- Northern District of Georgia
- Other
- Seventh Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
- South Carolina State Courts
- Tenth Circuit
- Third Circuit
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Western District of North Carolina