Class Actions Brief Blog

At oral argument in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, TransUnion’s counsel told the U.S. Supreme Court that a lack of harm is a reason “to break out the champagne, not to break out a lawsuit.” The Court has now decided TransUnion, and its decision may make it harder for class-action plaintiffs to sue for non-traditional harms. As a result, class-action defendants may be inclined to pop a cork or two. The full implications of the decision remain to be seen, however, so the best course for now may be to keep the refreshments on ice.

TransUnion was a class action brought under a federal statute ...

While Roundup herbicide may be able to kill unwanted weeds, Monsanto, the maker of Roundup, is having a much harder time weeding out unwanted lawsuits. Recent cases alleging Roundup caused cancer have resulted in verdicts of tens of millions of dollars per plaintiff. Now Monsanto’s attempt to round up future claims into a class action settlement is coming under renewed scrutiny.

The Roundup Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”)
In 2015, the World Health Organization designated the active ingredient in Roundup as probably carcinogenic. Since then—and despite the U.S ...

This post concerns a recurring topic in class-action practice: how a party—through its own litigation conduct—can waive its right to arbitrate.

The topic warrants attention, or at least came to our attention, because of a recent decision from a federal appellate court. The case, called Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., is a putative nationwide collective action filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The defendant (Sundance) owns Taco Bell franchises in multiple states. The plaintiff (Robyn Morgan) worked at a Sundance restaurant in Iowa. She has accused Sundance of not paying her ...

It appears that the answer may be yes. In 2017, the General Assembly amended G.S. § 7A-27 to permit defendants to take interlocutory appeals from orders granting class certification. Prior to the amendment, plaintiffs could pursue interlocutory appeals from orders denying class certification, but defendants had no reciprocal right of appeal.

As amended, section 7A-27(a) states that “[a]ppeal lies of right directly to the Supreme Court” from “any trial court’s decision regarding class action certification under G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 23.” It also states that appeal lies of ...

There are 7 justices on the North Carolina Supreme Court, and 4 are required to constitute a quorum. But what if 5 of the 7 justices have a family history of public service that could prevent them from hearing an appeal?

In Lake v. State Health Plan for Teachers & State Employees, 852 S.E.2d 888 (N.C. 2021), a class of over 220,000 members (or their estates) of the North Carolina Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System spanning over two decades challenged a law requiring them to pay a premium to obtain health insurance coverage. The retirees prevailed at the trial court level ...

Last month, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in a case that would determine whether the Court’s 2017 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California would extend to federal class actions.

In Bristol-Myers Squibb, the Supreme Court ruled that in mass tort actions, state courts do not have specific personal jurisdiction over claims by plaintiffs who were not injured in and do not live in the forum state. There, a national group of plaintiffs sued a New York and Delaware-based pharmaceutical company in California court, alleging the defendant’s drug ...

There is no shortage of consumer class actions these days, but most of these cases are settled or dismissed. If trials are rare, trials of class actions are rarer, if only because of the stakes.   

In 2017, Dish Network tried its luck with a jury in the Middle District of North Carolina regarding claims that it made over 50,000 telephone solicitations to 18,000 residential phone numbers on the Do-Not-Call list in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Dish lost and the Court trebled the jury award of $400 per call, resulting in $61,342,800 in total damages with $20.4 million in ...

The Fourth Circuit’s opinion in Bell v. Brockett, No. 18-1149 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2019), posits that “[d]efendant class actions are so rare they have been compared to unicorns.” But what may be even rarer is an opinion, like Bell, in which a court opines on the fundamental and concerning nature of the district court’s clear errors regarding the appointment of class counsel, but nonetheless decides not to reverse. 

Bell arises from the ZeekRewards.com (“Zeek”) fraud scheme. Zeek offered participants the opportunity to share in revenues generated by Zeek’s supposed ...

Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court held in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, No. 17-988 (April 24, 2019) that an ambiguous agreement cannot authorize class arbitration. The 5-4 decision split along ideological lines, with Chief Justice Roberts writing for the Court’s conservative majority. Per Roberts’ opinion, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires both parties to an arbitration agreement to give their full consent to authorize class arbitration, a “markedly different” process than traditional individualized arbitration. In its 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen v ...

Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. Here is a recap of Spring 2019's filings:

Chrismon v. Meadow Greens Pizza LLC, et al., No. 5:19-cv-155 (E.D.N.C. April 17, 2019) (purported collective and class action brought under FLSA and state wage and hour laws alleging defendant failed to pay delivery drivers for their delivery-related expenses)

Prioleau v. Ascension Data & Analytics LLC, No. 2:19-cv-1116 (D.S.C. April 16, 2019) (putative class action alleging defendant violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to ...